Brahman and Atman | The Nature of Reality
Unlike
other world religions, people following Hindu traditions are liberal to
practice anything we feel that corresponds to our personality and likes ie., we are free to believe and practice what is right for our minds and are not forced by our
community to practice and strictly follow certain rules simply because you are born into
that community. Our culture was always secular. However, we end up in a wrong
cave, doing this, blinded by the western materialism and ordered structural
model of how to live life. Human life cannot be simply tuned with books or rules
written by someone. During old times, anyone could come up with stories and tell
that they met god or that they are god, and could bring a political order among
the community.
So, what is the concept of God in Hindu
tradition? Why do we have 33 million gods in this tradition? Can we humans understand
god? If we can understand god, then is god that easily understandable? Then why
should we humans, lie that we understand god better than others?
One
feature of diversity that is especially striking to outsiders is the
multiplicity of Gods within Hindu tradition. There are those with a specific
area of jurisdiction for which the word "god" with a small “g” might
be appropriate, and there are those of such all-embracing supremacy that only
the term "God" with a capital “G” will do. In any Hindu temple there
are likely to be many divine images, or murtis,
even though the central image may be of a particular God, a form of Shiva, or
the Goddess, or Vishnu. In a temple of Shiva, for example, the central sanctum
will contain a Shiva linga,
a simple stone shaft, where offerings of flowers, sweets, grains, and water may
be presented. Surrounding this central sanctum, however, there may be a dozen
subsidiary shrines to various deities. To one side of Shiva might be the image
of his son Ganesha, the elephant-headed god. On the other, there might be the
image of another son, Murugan, also known as Skanda or Karttikeya. Elsewhere
there might be shrines dedicated to Lord Rama, with his wife Sita at his side.
There might be an image of the River Ganges, personified and bearing a brimming
pot of sacred waters. There might be an image of Lord Krishna, playing the
flute and attracting all who hear with its amorous melody.
Hinduism represents the diversity and plurality of the Divine.
There are many Gods, and there are many names and forms of each God. But most
worshippers would insist that this many-ness must be understood in relation to
God’s oneness. The sages of old used the term Brahman to describe the Reality
that transcends all personal names. Brahman is one, though the “names and
forms” of this one are different. This one Reality—call it Brahman, the Divine,
or the Real—can be perceived in and through an infinite number of names and
forms. The Rig Veda affirms, “Reality is One. The sages speak of it in many
ways.” This idea is sounded repeatedly throughout the whole history of
Hinduism.
Brahman and
Atman : That Art Thou
The Upanishads, dating largely from the eighth to the sixth centuries BCE, are the “wisdom literature” of the Vedas. Most Upanishads take the form of dialogues between teachers and students. They explore speculative questions about the origin, basis, and support of the universe. “What is the cause? What is Brahman? Whence are we born? Whereby do we live? On what are we established?” So asks the seeker in the Shvetashvatara Upanishad.
The teachers of the Upanishads point the way to a profound
realization: Atman, the inmost soul or breath of life, is also Brahman, the
ultimate reality that pervades the entire universe. Reality beyond is also
within. The teachers of the Upanishads teach by example and analogy. One asks
his student to bring him a fig.
“Open it,” says the teacher. “What do you see there?”
“Some very small seeds, sir.”
“Open one of those small seeds. What do you see there?”
“Nothing at all, sir.”
“Truly from what you cannot see, the whole fig tree grows. That is Reality. That is Atman. That art Thou.”
Brahman underlies the whole universe. It is the life-force which is the subtle essence of everything. One cannot see Brahman, as one cannot see the inside of the tiny seed of a fig. But Brahman is there and gives life to all, as the seed produces the fig tree. Whether inside the fig seed or inside oneself, it is the same living source.
“Open it,” says the teacher. “What do you see there?”
“Some very small seeds, sir.”
“Open one of those small seeds. What do you see there?”
“Nothing at all, sir.”
“Truly from what you cannot see, the whole fig tree grows. That is Reality. That is Atman. That art Thou.”
Brahman underlies the whole universe. It is the life-force which is the subtle essence of everything. One cannot see Brahman, as one cannot see the inside of the tiny seed of a fig. But Brahman is there and gives life to all, as the seed produces the fig tree. Whether inside the fig seed or inside oneself, it is the same living source.
![]() |
Atman is this drop of water rising from the ocean (Brahman), which eventually has to fall back into it.(source:author) |
Other teachers take a different teaching strategy in pointing to
Brahman. Rather than seeing Brahman as pervading the universe, they speak of
Brahman as wholly transcendent, describable in human terms only by saying what
Brahman is not: “It is not coarse, not fine, not short, not long, odorless,
tasteless, without eye, without ear, without voice, without name, not aging, not dying, without measure, without inside and without outside.” This way of
speaking stretches the mind beyond the available categories of the world to
glimpse that which cannot be contained by human categories.
*stay tuned to read more.
Comments
Post a Comment